Wisconsin Supreme Court:Wisconsin reports; cases determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin Volume 169
- nouveau livre ISBN: 9781235666209
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not … Plus…
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 edition. Excerpt: ... Schroeder & Daly Co. v. Industrial Comm. 169 Wis. 567. services growing out of and incidental to his employment (sub. (2), sec. 2394--3, Stats.). It is the contention of plaintiffs that the injury sustained by the applicant is one which did not grow out of his employment, but was the result of an ordinary street risk. This contention is based upon the proposition laid down in McNicol''s Case, 215 Mass. 497, 102 N. E. 697, that the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood, and upon Hoenig v. Industrial Comm. 159 Wis. 646, 150 N. W. 996, where it was held that an injury caused by lightning stroke while the applicant was working on a dam and not exposed by reason of his employment to a hazard peculiar to the industry or differing from a hazard to which all outdoor workers are exposed, was not one arising out of or incidental to his employment. The use of the word peculiar in this connection is perhaps unfortunate and not exactly accurate. A hazard peculiar to an industry, as that word is most frequently used, is a hazard which belongs exclusively to that industry. That the word, however, is not used with that meaning in the cases referred to, is plain upon a moment''s reflection. It is used rather in the sense of a risk which appertains to the particular industry, or, in other words, a risk which is inseparably connected with it and so incidental to it. While it is said in the Iloenig Case that the matter turns upon the nature of the hazard, when the statement is taken in connection with the context it will be seen that the pivotal question is as stated in Ellingson L. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 168 Wis. 227, 169 N. W. 668, Is the injury one resulting from a hazard that necessarily pertains to the... Wisconsin Supreme Court, Books, History, Wisconsin reports; cases determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin Volume 169 Books>History, General Books LLC<
| | Indigo.canew Free shipping on orders above $25. Frais d'envoiplus shipping costs., Livraison non-comprise Details... |
(*) Livre non disponible signifie que le livre est actuellement pas disponible à l'une des plates-formes associées nous recherche.
Wisconsin Supreme Court:Wisconsin reports; cases determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin Volume 169
- nouveau livre ISBN: 9781235666209
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not … Plus…
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 edition. Excerpt: ... Schroeder & Daly Co. v. Industrial Comm. 169 Wis. 567. services growing out of and incidental to his employment (sub. (2), sec. 2394--3, Stats.). It is the contention of plaintiffs that the injury sustained by the applicant is one which did not grow out of his employment, but was the result of an ordinary street risk. This contention is based upon the proposition laid down in McNicol''s Case, 215 Mass. 497, 102 N. E. 697, that the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood, and upon Hoenig v. Industrial Comm. 159 Wis. 646, 150 N. W. 996, where it was held that an injury caused by lightning stroke while the applicant was working on a dam and not exposed by reason of his employment to a hazard peculiar to the industry or differing from a hazard to which all outdoor workers are exposed, was not one arising out of or incidental to his employment. The use of the word peculiar in this connection is perhaps unfortunate and not exactly accurate. A hazard peculiar to an industry, as that word is most frequently used, is a hazard which belongs exclusively to that industry. That the word, however, is not used with that meaning in the cases referred to, is plain upon a moment''s reflection. It is used rather in the sense of a risk which appertains to the particular industry, or, in other words, a risk which is inseparably connected with it and so incidental to it. While it is said in the Iloenig Case that the matter turns upon the nature of the hazard, when the statement is taken in connection with the context it will be seen that the pivotal question is as stated in Ellingson L. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 168 Wis. 227, 169 N. W. 668, Is the injury one resulting from a hazard that necessarily pertains to the... Wisconsin Supreme Court, Books, History, Wisconsin reports; cases determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin Volume 169 Books>History <
(*) Livre non disponible signifie que le livre est actuellement pas disponible à l'une des plates-formes associées nous recherche.