ISBN: 1230020004

[EAN: 9781230020006], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 200 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.4in.This historic book may have numerou… Plus…

[EAN: 9781230020006], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 200 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.4in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910 edition. Excerpt: . . . broader significance than known mines. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Grey Eagle Oil C0. (C. C. ), 104 Fed. 20. The term mineral lands refers to a class of lands, rather than specific tracts easily ascertainable, not only by the land department, but by the applicants themselves. This distinction, while not clearly made, seems to underlie the decisions on this subject; so that the cases which hold that patents obtained under the pre-emption acts to land containing known mines are void for want of jurisdiction and may be collaterally attacked are distinguishable from those holding that the determination of the land department as to the mineral character of the lands conveyed is conclusive, and that patents issued to such lands will not be subject to such attack; the distinction being that in the former there w-as such a carving out and segregation of certain specific tracts that the land department is held to be without authority, not only to grant the title of the government, but also to conclusively decide the question of its right to issue patents. In the latter, the reservation being of a class of lands, it is not only within the province, but is made a duty required of the land department to make the classification; and its action in that matter, being within its jurisdiction, is conclusive. This is the distinction which in my view is to be made between the case at bar and the Burfenning case, and also the Clay case. CAMPBELL, J. --I concur in the result reached in this case, but desire briefly to state my view of the question of law involved. Whether or not the judgment of the land department as evidenced by its patent to a given tract of public land is conclusive and not open to collateral attack depends upon. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.<

2013, ISBN: 1230020004

[EAN: 9781230020006], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missin… Plus…

[EAN: 9781230020006], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910 edition. Excerpt: .broader significance than known mines. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Grey Eagle Oil C0. (C. C.), 104 Fed. 20. The term mineral lands refers to a class of lands, rather than specific tracts easily ascertainable, not only by the land department, but by the applicants themselves. This distinction, while not clearly made, seems to underlie the decisions on this subject; so that the cases which hold that patents obtained under the pre-emption acts to land containing known mines are void for want of jurisdiction and may be collaterally attacked are distinguishable from those holding that the determination of the land department as to the mineral character of the lands conveyed is conclusive, and that patents issued to such lands will not be subject to such attack; the distinction being that in the former there w-as such a carving out and segregation of certain specific tracts that the land department is held to be without authority, not only to grant the title of the government, but also to conclusively decide the question of its right to issue patents. In the latter, the reservation being of a class of lands, it is not only within the province, but is made a duty required of the land department to make the classification; and its action in that matter, being within its jurisdiction, is conclusive. This is the distinction which in my view is to be made between the case at bar and the Burfenning case, and also the Clay case. CAMPBELL, J.--I concur in the result reached in this case, but desire briefly to state my view of the question of law involved. Whether or not the judgment of the land department as evidenced by its patent to a given tract of public land is conclusive and not open to collateral attack depends upon.<

ISBN: 9781230020006

Anonymous, Paperback, English-language edition, Pub by General Books LLC Books Reports-of-cases-argued-and-determined-in-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-territory-of-Arizona-Volume-11~~Anonymou… Plus…

Anonymous, Paperback, English-language edition, Pub by General Books LLC Books Reports-of-cases-argued-and-determined-in-the-Supreme-Court-of-the-territory-of-Arizona-Volume-11~~Anonymous General Books LLC<