ISBN: 9781235720970

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 134 pages. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned … Plus…

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 134 pages. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896. Excerpt: . . . Robert Goelet t. Frank N. Roe. ROBERT GOELET et at. v. FRANK N. ROE et at. N. Y. Court Of Common Pleas, General Term, August, 1895. 2235. Summary proceedings--landlord may remove sub-lessee after expiration of lease to lessee. Under section 2285 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorizing the landlord or lessor of the demised premises to maintain proceedings for removal of the persons in possession after expiration of the term, the landlord may, after the expiration of the term, maintain summary proceedings against one holding as sub-lessee under a covenant of removal from the landlords lessee. (Decided August, 1895. ) Summary proceedings for possession of premises. Appeal from Sixth District Court. George D. De Witt, for appellants. P. C. Talman, for respondents. Bischoff, J. --The unchallenged facts are that on October 16, 1893, the petitioners let the premises 402 Fourth avenue, in the City of New York, to Frederick N. Roe for one year from May 1, 1894, without provision of any kind for a renewal of the lease; that Frederick N. Roe thereupon sublet the premises to the respondent Mary R. Yost for the same period, and covenanted to renew the lease for one year from the expiration of the first; and that in September, 1894, the petitioners let the premises to Adeline V. Roe, the wife of Frederick N. Roe, for one year, commencing May 1, 1895. These proceedings for the removal of Frederick N. Roe, and all persons in pos Robert Goelet v. Frank N. Roe. session of the premises claiming under him, were instituted by the petitioners on May 3, 1895, three days after their lease to the said Frederick N. Koe had expired. Only the sub-lessee Yost defended, denying the petitioners right to possession, and asserting that the lease to Mrs. Eoe was in furtherance. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN., RareBooksClub<